The Engine Aggressiveness Score Ratinglist
The world's first engine-ratinglist not measuring strength of engines, but engines's style of play !!!
"Elo is not the end to the means, playing style is, and Stefan's EAS tool is still the best around to measure aggressiveness." - Ed Schroeder (Computerchess legend, author of Rebel engine and famous chesscomputers (Mephisto MM IV, Polgar, Milano, Risc and many more!)), 2024
The EAS-Score is calculated by my Engines Aggressiveness Statistics Tool out of the games of the gamebase of the UHO-Top15 Ratinglist (main-site) (120000 played games overall). Download the tool here
Meanwhile, the scoring-system of the EAS-Tool got really complex, click here and read the EAS-Scoring explanation.
Here the EAS-ratinglist and at the right side (for comparison), the engines and their normal ranking in my UHO-Top15 Ratinglist (see main-site).
Latest update: 2024/11/18: Lizard 11.1
See the full EAS-Statistics (2nd ratinglist is below the EAS-ratinglist with all stats): here
bad avg.win
Rank EAS-Score sacs shorts draws moves Engine/player
-------------------------------------------------------------------
1 171749 23.19% 15.44% 08.90% 74 Stockfish 241113 a512
2 158800 20.97% 14.91% 10.40% 74 Stockfish 17 240906
3 117665 13.82% 17.42% 16.17% 74 Lizard 11.1 a512
4 114188 12.56% 18.11% 15.07% 73 Torch 3 popavx2
5 104368 12.87% 13.08% 14.93% 77 Obsidian 14.0 a512
6 84551 15.05% 13.57% 18.31% 78 RubiChess 240817 avx2
7 83452 14.81% 14.91% 20.73% 76 KomodoDragon 3.3 avx2
8 83151 13.39% 10.89% 17.54% 80 Alexandria 7.1 a512
9 78411 11.96% 08.69% 20.29% 81 Clover 8.0 avx2
10 77214 13.49% 06.76% 18.68% 81 Integral 5.0 a512
11 71239 09.56% 10.77% 17.46% 81 PlentyChess 2.1 avx2
12 65474 14.24% 07.37% 19.22% 87 Ethereal 14.38 avx2
13 57174 09.21% 07.76% 20.37% 81 Berserk 13 avx2
14 55891 10.85% 08.69% 21.89% 82 Caissa 1.21 a512
15 48967 11.31% 07.54% 25.07% 85 Starzix 6.0 a512
16 42267 07.80% 07.76% 26.91% 80 Viridithas 15.0 a512
-------------------------------------------------------------------
*** Average length of all won games: 78 moves
| for comparison
UHO-Top15 Ranking
--------------------------
1 Stockfish 241113 a512
2 Stockfish 17 240906
3 Torch 3 popavx2
4 Obsidian 14.0 a512
5 Berserk 13 avx2
6 KomodoDragon 3.3 avx2
7 Caissa 1.21 a512
8 Alexandria 7.1 a512
9 PlentyChess 2.1 avx2
10 Ethereal 14.38 avx2
11 RubiChess 240817 avx2
12 Starzix 6.0 a512
13 Viridithas 15.0 a512
14 Integral 5.0 a512
15 Clover 8.0 avx2
16 Lizard 11.1 a512
|
EAS single statistics Highscores (Top 5 Engines)
Mention, all EAS-Stats are percent-values, not absolute numbers. So, a weaker engine (with much fewer wins than (for example) Stockfish), can achieve high EAS-Stats and Highscores, too...
A: Most high-value sacrifices (3+ pawnunits) : [1]:03.81% Stockfish 241113 a512
[2]:03.35% Stockfish 17 240906
[3]:02.48% Lizard 11.1 a512
[4]:02.07% Clover 8.0 avx2
[5]:01.85% Obsidian 14.0 a512
B: Most sacrifices overall : [1]:23.19% Stockfish 241113 a512
[2]:20.97% Stockfish 17 240906
[3]:15.05% RubiChess 240817 avx2
[4]:14.81% KomodoDragon 3.3 avx2
[5]:14.24% Ethereal 14.38 avx2
C: Very short wins (45 moves or less) : [1]:01.06% Stockfish 17 240906
[2]:01.05% Stockfish 241113 a512
[3]:01.02% Torch 3 popavx2
[4]:00.88% Lizard 11.1 a512
[5]:00.83% RubiChess 240817 avx2
D: Most short wins overall : [1]:18.11% Torch 3 popavx2
[2]:17.42% Lizard 11.1 a512
[3]:15.44% Stockfish 241113 a512
[4]:14.91% Stockfish 17 240906
[5]:14.91% KomodoDragon 3.3 avx2
E: Average length of all won games : [1]:073 Torch 3 popavx2
[2]:074 Lizard 11.1 a512
[3]:074 Stockfish 17 240906
[4]:074 Stockfish 241113 a512
[5]:076 KomodoDragon 3.3 avx2
F: Smallest number of bad draws : [1]:08.90% Stockfish 241113 a512
[2]:10.40% Stockfish 17 240906
[3]:14.93% Obsidian 14.0 a512
[4]:15.07% Torch 3 popavx2
[5]:16.17% Lizard 11.1 a512
The EAS-tool is based on my Sacrifice Games Search Turbo Tool. Use this tool for searching games with sacrifices, only. It is extremly fast and allows to search big pgn-databases very quickly. Download it right here